Answer is Yes and No. Ultimately, there's nothing recursion can compute that looping can't, but looping takes a lot more plumbing. Therefore, the one thing recursion can do that loops can't is make some tasks super easy.

Recursion Build Trees, Take walking a tree. Walking a tree with recursion is stupid-easy. It's the most natural thing in the world. Walking a tree with loops is a lot less straightforward. You have to maintain a stack or some other data structure to keep track of what you've done.

Often, the recursive solution to a problem is easier. That's a technical term, and it matters.

Finally, doing loops instead of recursion means to manually handle the stack. ðŸ˜‡

It Seems like recursion is a clear winner.ðŸ˜Ž

But There are some situation , where recursion will Fail and Loops Win's.ðŸ˜‡ Following is the situation.

However, you may run into problems if you make a very large number of recursive calls.

For instance, let's say that the size of the stack is limited to 2 MB for your program. In this case, it can't sustain one million calls of a function like this:

``````int fun(int n){
if(n==0)return n;
else
return fun(n-1) + 1;
}``````

Here, every level of recursion uses at least 4 bytes of memory and you will run into stack overflow if you call this function with n=1123456.

via GIPHY

Typically, some situation iterative (looping) solution will need just as much storage, but will need to manage it explicitly.

Finally the conclusion Recursion and Looping both are tool to solve a problem, but when we think the best to use, then based on the situation which suits best , which makes the algo easier or best fitted for the situation.

That's All Folks , Happy Learning ðŸ˜Ž